Skip to main content

Lots of testing, very little learning.

"I don't understand why I have to do all these tests. I mean, it's not as if I'm learning anything."

These were the words of my son, a few days ago.

My son is in P7, his final year of primary school, and so far his year has been blighted. Blighted by tests, dozens and dozens of them. Blighted by the incessant, soul destroying grind that is the transfer test, formerly known as the 11 plus.

Since Easter, the entire focus of his schooling has been working towards the transfer test in November. The intensity is building up. First practice tests completed in April, May, June. Then, the summer revision pack, "just to keep his eye in". And now he's in P7, all systems are go: 2 practice tests a week, another to do at home at weekends. When he's not doing a practice test, he's reviewing a completed practice test or practising for the next practice test.

The tests he does are either numeracy or literacy or both and that is all he does; day in, day out. And all because of the transfer test. And when I say transfer test, I actually mean transfer tests, 5 of them! 12th November, 19th November (2 tests), 26th November and 3rd December.

And then there are the parents! Crazy, stressed, panicking parents, desperate for their little darlings to live up to their parents' aspirations - tutoring, extra revision, pressure, pressure, pressure. We've not gone down that route, which makes us feel intermittently smug that we're not succumbing to the system and intermittently guilty that we're not good parents seeking to do the best for our child!

"And what's it all for?" I hear you ask. Well, it's all about getting a place in grammar school. Despite the fact that the final official 11-plus took place in 2008, no satisfactory measures were put in place to deal with the transfer of pupils from primary to post-primary education, as the grammar schools insisted that they continue to have the right to select pupils on the basis of academic assessment.

Northern Ireland has, notionally, a two tier post-primary education system; grammar schools and secondary schools. In theory, grammar schools are elite academic institutions while secondary schools pick up those who do not wish to pursue an academic career or who fail to achieve the standard required to enter the grammar school. I say in theory because, as Slugger O'Toole points out in their article on grammar school intake, many grammar schools accept pupils who are well down the academic scale. Equally, many secondary schools offer A-levels and the best secondary schools achieve results that can often compare with those of grammars.

As a result of this, my son has to take two different types of entrance test - one offered by a local consortium, the Association for Quality Education and the other by GL Assessment. One of the schools he is likely to be applying to can be seen in the Slugger article above to accept pupils from right across the academic scale. The other only accepts high achievers, creaming the top 170-odd pupils from the 400-ish 10 and 11 year olds who sit the test.

My son will probably do pretty well, possibly very well - he's bright and able - unless he has an off-day; starts to daydream; spots something interesting out the window. (cue onset of parental panic...) He's aiming for the high achieving school. If he fails, he will most certainly do well enough to get into the second choice. He'd have to mess up big time for that not to happen. His primary school knows this. The teachers in the school know their pupils and know who is academically able and also who has strengths in other areas. But the test is king and must be obeyed. In the meantime, in the words of my son, he's not been learning anything.

So we're up early tomorrow morning for the first of the four Saturdays of testing hell. We all can't wait for it to be over.

I wish it wasn't this way, but it is, so all I can say is "good luck wee man".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr Richard Schwier, Informal Learning and My Web

Way way behind in commenting on the goings on in eci831, but it's been another busy week. This past week I have listened to MP3s of George Siemens ' session on Connectivism, and Richard Schwier 's session on Learning Communities. I also watched the Elluminate recording of Sue Waters ' session on Educational Blogging where she posed the question " what are your thoughts on educational blogging? ". There has been lots of food for thought from all 3 sessions and it's very difficult to summarise where I am with it all. A few key points would be: - I'm a lurker, but hopefully not a loafer - I DO feel engaged, with the learning if not so much with my fellow learners - I'm a 'not for credit' student - what I'm involved in is definitely non-formal learning with the odd informal moment along the way. - I feel connected to the course and the social element is something I am conscious of and engaged with on the periphery. I wish I was more engage...

Words, words, words...

A couple of items in the media caught my attention and started me thinking about the strange beast that is the English language. Firstly, there was an interview on Radio 5 Live with two people in Corby in connection with the story about birth defects and the link with toxic waste . During the course of the interview both interviewees either used a word incorrectly or made up a word. In both cases, on first hearing, it was almost possible to believe that the words were correct, but something jarred and the errors made me laugh and despair at the same time. In the first instance, the interviewee said that "the council was clearly negligible " in their dealings with the toxic waste. In the second instance, a few seconds later a second interviewee said that "the ruling showed that there had clearly been neglection on the part of the council...". I assume that the first interviewee meant to say negligent and the second neglect, but the two mistakes started me thin...

Social Media and Open Education - getting started...

So, I signed up for a Social Media and Open Education course (EC&I 831) as a non-credit student. The course is being run by Alec Couros from the University of Regina in Saskatchewan (which always makes me think of the Proclaimers song "Cap in Hand"), but that was a several weeks ago. Since then, I have, for various reasons, done nothing... Now, I'm catching up! Easy stuff: Follow all the people from the course who are following me, and follow a few extras. I didn't opt to follow everyone - not sure why not, but I imagine it's because I just felt slightly intimidated by the sheer numbers of them. I'm sure I'll add a few more over the duration of the course as I get to see who's doing what and who has interesting things to say. Mind you, if others use the same criteria, I'm not sure I'll generate many new followers! Sort out Twitterdeck - new Twitter column for course related activity. This should help me to keep track of what people are...