Skip to main content

Where do i fit...


...in the big picture???

I was reading Stewart Mader's excellent blog on wikis and his post on where wikis fit in the overall scheme of things. This article linked to a blog by Erica Driver on some work the Forrester people have done on looking at Web 2.0, its core technologies, its applications and most importantly, what they let you do and what that means for people, business, life.
I was particularly taken with the third concentric circle, Behavior Changes, and Erica's statement that "Not everyone is out there blogging and tagging; we've found that people fall into several buckets: creators, critics, collectors, joiners, spectators, and inactives." This came to me just as I was contemplating similar thoughts myself in respect of me. While I blog a little (very little and very badly!) and I tag a bit (a bit of delicious and some flikr) I'm not really sure I'm a fully fledged creator. I comment rarely on blogs, so probably not much of a critic either. I suspect I'm probably either a collector or a joiner though I haven't investigated sufficiently to find out what in detail these are!
I think, however, that it's important that there is room for all these different types of people in the Web 2.0 world. It can be an intimidating place if you feel under pressure to come up with interesting and original posts when you appear to be surrounded by so many people doing so many amazing things and with such insightful comments that you can be left feeling rather overwhelmed and discouraged. Maybe the life of a joiner isn't so bad after all, and better a joiner than an inactive!

Still, in the words of my wee fella's teacher when he was in P1, "stick at it...".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Social Media and Open Education - getting started...

So, I signed up for a Social Media and Open Education course (EC&I 831) as a non-credit student. The course is being run by Alec Couros from the University of Regina in Saskatchewan (which always makes me think of the Proclaimers song "Cap in Hand"), but that was a several weeks ago. Since then, I have, for various reasons, done nothing... Now, I'm catching up! Easy stuff: Follow all the people from the course who are following me, and follow a few extras. I didn't opt to follow everyone - not sure why not, but I imagine it's because I just felt slightly intimidated by the sheer numbers of them. I'm sure I'll add a few more over the duration of the course as I get to see who's doing what and who has interesting things to say. Mind you, if others use the same criteria, I'm not sure I'll generate many new followers! Sort out Twitterdeck - new Twitter column for course related activity. This should help me to keep track of what people are...

It's been a while...

It's been a while since I last blogged and it's also been a while since I last played cricket.  These items are not linked.  Cricket season started, for me, on Saturday.  We lost, and it was a fairly miserable experience on a ropey ground with even ropier weather.  Sign of things to come?  Let's hope not.  More blogging in the offing? Who knows?

Bing v Google

On the face of it, this battle is still no-contest, however... I came across an interesting item on the RIA Journal blog pointing out that Facebook now uses Bing to power their extended search results and not Google. This possibly goes some way to explain the apparent optimism detected by Rory Cellan-Jones when he recently met with some Microsoft executives . As Rory points out however, Bing has only 3.3% of the market, with Google retaining an impressive 84%. Rory makes the point that he, like many, tried out Bing when it first came out but then reverted back to Google and that Bing’s biggest challenge would be to break down that user inertia. Basically, why bother going to Bing? If Bing can get itself “institutionalised” by becoming embedded in major tools like Facebook then it stands a chance. If it can’t, it will remain insignificant. The big question I have is why did Facebook choose Bing?